Before you know it, one more year has passed. 2010 has ended and in a hour or so 2011 begins!
2010 has been a very happening year. So many things happened this it is hard to believe that all of them actually did.
Me and my family
I completed my PhD
My sister got married!
I got a job. My first real job (I am not joking!)
I got a chance to see if I can stand up for my choice the second time
I moved out of Austin
I left the United States to move to Canada
I am beginning a new phase of my life in Montreal
My standing up for myself did work this time
During this year period I learned a lot about a friend.
Friends
one guy found a gult bandi
one couple moved into their new hosue
one guy found a marathi bandi
one couple are having a kid
one guy is standing up to his parents
one guy is still pondering whether he should put fight or not
Cricket and Tennis
Sehwag had a decent time
Indian cricket team is at the top in Tests. Thats all I ask for!
Federer had an ok year. Nadal had a great year.
Oh yes, Tendulkar hit a 200 in onedays and 50 hundreds in tests (people who are surprised at me saying good things about Tendulkar, i have really changed :))
TV shows
I have completed watching Frasier the third time and am upto third season the fourth time
Watched Seinfeld twice
Watching Becker again
Books
India after Gandhi was good, really good.
Other notable books Atlas Shrugged (finally), Crime and Punishment, My Experiments with Truth (Even I can't believe i read this one), Unaccustomed Earth, Winesburg, Ohio. Overall a little less than my normal!
I wish all my readers (a small number I know) a happy and prosperous new year!
Friday, December 31, 2010
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Taking sycophancy to higher levels
Look at this
I am no fan of Mahatma, but I am sure even he is turning in his grave at this comparison.
Full piece
here
Oh yes, in the same book that Congress authorized to be written by historians they could devote only a paragraph to some of the greatest disasters in Post Independence era. If you know Congress government you would have guessed these tragedies correctly (Sikh riots and Bhopal plant). Of course, the fact that the congress government had a major role in these events has nothing to do with it!
“People looked upon Sonia Gandhi's renunciation of power as reminiscent of the Mahatma,'' the book suggests in a chapter “Congress in Coalition'' that trace the Congress' return to power in 2004.
I am no fan of Mahatma, but I am sure even he is turning in his grave at this comparison.
Full piece
here
Oh yes, in the same book that Congress authorized to be written by historians they could devote only a paragraph to some of the greatest disasters in Post Independence era. If you know Congress government you would have guessed these tragedies correctly (Sikh riots and Bhopal plant). Of course, the fact that the congress government had a major role in these events has nothing to do with it!
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Will India Listen to
this advice. I really hope so. But, with our political system, who am I kidding!
Friday, December 24, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
A sensible piece on
Congress's ludicrous assault on RSS
Some excerpts
Some excerpts
The exercise initiated by Mrs.Sonia Gandhi, the President of the Congress (I), and her cohorts at the just concluded 83rd plenary of the Congress (I) to have the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS) projected and demonised as a Hindu terrorist organisation comparable to the Nazi groups of World War II vintage and the more recent Islamic terrorist organisations speaks of the mental confusion that prevails at the senior levels of her party. It also highlights the total bankruptcy of thinking and the total indifference to sensitive issues that have become the defining characteristics of the party under her leadership in recent months.
...
The anti-RSS campaign of the Congress (I) will not only add to the already existing anger in sections of the Hindu community,but will also play into the hands of the jihadi terrorists by facilitating their objective of aggravating the divide between the Hindu and Muslim communities. Before this campaign starts further damaging the relations between the two communities, the Congress (I) should stop its demonisation of the RSS, which would prove counter-productive.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Tendulkar's batting with tail
Tendulkar scored 50 hundreds. Its a great achievement and a testament to the man's longevity in the game!
This post isn't about that.
When he came to bat on the 5th day I want to ask him what was his objective. Did he even believe that he can save the match? Did he just want to make sure he remained not out?
What I don't understand is when you are trying to save a match (yes it is very hard, but if you are not trying whats the point of playing) how can you take a single of the first ball and expose the tail to Dteyn and Morkel. Isn't it stupid? Why can't batsman see this? If its a first innings, yes no sense in shielding the tail because you want to score runs, so be positive take all the runs you can get. What was Tendulkar trying to do by taking singles and exposing the tail. Graeme Smith mentioned this in the interview. I am peeved at how every Tom Dick and Haryy of the cricket world had time to comment on Tendulkar reaching his 50th hundred (a great achievement no doubt) but did not offer any meaningful insight on decisions that are utterly stupid!
This is not to demean his innings. His batting was wonderful and responsible for India to be batting on the 5th. But I feel what he did on the fifth reveals a lack of tactical acumen on his part. I mean we needed 30 runs to make SA bat again. Wont it have been better for him to get out trying to score those runs than taking the not so useful singles and hoping Sree and Jadhav will survive Steyn and Morkel.
Also, all those supporters who are ecstatic at his 50th ton, please do remember India lost the match.
Anyway!
This post isn't about that.
When he came to bat on the 5th day I want to ask him what was his objective. Did he even believe that he can save the match? Did he just want to make sure he remained not out?
What I don't understand is when you are trying to save a match (yes it is very hard, but if you are not trying whats the point of playing) how can you take a single of the first ball and expose the tail to Dteyn and Morkel. Isn't it stupid? Why can't batsman see this? If its a first innings, yes no sense in shielding the tail because you want to score runs, so be positive take all the runs you can get. What was Tendulkar trying to do by taking singles and exposing the tail. Graeme Smith mentioned this in the interview. I am peeved at how every Tom Dick and Haryy of the cricket world had time to comment on Tendulkar reaching his 50th hundred (a great achievement no doubt) but did not offer any meaningful insight on decisions that are utterly stupid!
This is not to demean his innings. His batting was wonderful and responsible for India to be batting on the 5th. But I feel what he did on the fifth reveals a lack of tactical acumen on his part. I mean we needed 30 runs to make SA bat again. Wont it have been better for him to get out trying to score those runs than taking the not so useful singles and hoping Sree and Jadhav will survive Steyn and Morkel.
Also, all those supporters who are ecstatic at his 50th ton, please do remember India lost the match.
Anyway!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)