Friday, October 16, 2009

Indo-China relationships

Over the last 3-4 weeks there has been intense conflict over the Indo-China border in Arunachal Pradesh. There have been numerous articles written in this connection. I found a very interesting piece connecting the psychology of both countries based on historical context here and here
An excerpt from the second piece
From the earliest times, India lacked interest in the balance of power outside its own national frontiers. While China was continuously watchful of developments across its land frontiers and had developed a very efficient system of diplomatic relationship on a continental basis, the Indian idea of diplomacy was confined to states within the geographical limits of India. Within this area, at different times, India developed a system of international relations and diplomatic usage. But so far as areas outside the physical boundaries of India were concerned, we were content to live with the attitude of complacent ignorance.
Now about China (excerpt from first piece)
China, on the other hand, sees the world divided between the civilised world centred around itself, the Middle Kingdom, on the one hand and the world of uncivilised barbarians on the other. At the periphery of the Middle Kingdom (and still within the civilised world) lay the states who paid tribute to the Chinese emperor and professed to be in awe of its great civilisation. What this meant in practice was that the Han Chinese Middle Kingdom expected its neighbours to be tributaries—the concept of a sovereign equal simply didn’t exist.
Views of a commander on the situation
“Common sense” according to Admiral Sureesh Mehta, “that cooperation with China would be preferable to competition or conflict, as it would be foolhardy to compare India and China as equals. China’s GDP is more than thrice that of ours and its per capita GDP is 2.2 times our own.”
It is very interesting to see how the knowledge of past history and attitudes might have important implications for today's geo-political equation.

More material on similar topics here, and here.

No comments: